CHILD ABUSE? WHERE IS THE MORAL OUTRAGE?

By Rev. Mario Gonzalez Jr., Esq. 

Not to long ago, 10-year-old Canadian boy Nemis Quinn Mélançon-Golden was featured in a photo with the Season 7 winner of "RuPaul's Drag Race," Violet Chachki. In the shocking photo, Violet is wearing nothing but a pair of heels and a small piece of fabric covering his genitals, as seen in the screenshot below. 



So this is now acceptable behavior? Parents can allow their small children to engage in these sexually suggestive photo shoots? I am the father of two beautiful girls and simply cannot believe that parents are not freaking out right about now all over the country when seeing images like this one. 

This is the kind of thing that the LGB-T lobby is now trying to shove down society's collective throats, as young public school children all around the country (including New Jersey) are being indoctrinated into celebrating the LGB-T lifestyle as morally virtuous, despite their family’s objections arising from their deeply held religious beliefs. 

To our collective shame as a country, this image is likely marginally legal when using the 6 criteria Dost Test because it only meets 2 of the 6 standards used by the test to establish what is a pornographic image. This, of course, does not make it any less morally reprehensible. 

The image arguably meets these 2 of the 6 criterias outlined in the Dost Test:

5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity.

6. Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.

Though shocking and highly troubling, I'm using the full image in our blog in the hope that it will help to stir up the moral outrage and opprobrium the image and the parents of this child deserve.